Wokingham Borough is at the start of an Electoral Review by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE). What this means is that the LGBCE is looking at how many councillors the Borough needs in total, the number of area boundaries (“wards”) and where these are located, and how many councillors represent each ward. Alongside this review, the Council’s Executive last night agreed to recommend to Council that we have a public consultation on whether the Borough should move to having whole-council elections.
At the moment, the Borough has a mix of different election frequency depending on where you live. For example, if you are in Earley, you live in a three-councillor ward, with elections held in three out of every four years to choose one of your three councillors. If you live in one part of Woodley, you have two councillors and have elections every two years – if you are in another part of Woodley, it is the same as Earley. And if you live in Charvil, you have one councillor and have Borough Council elections once every four years.
Due to changes in the law from several years ago, the Electoral Review will sweep away this system in favour of one of two options:
- every ward has three councillors, and elections are held in three out of every four years (called ‘election-by-thirds’);
- or wards can have one, two or three councillors, but with every councillor elected at the same time once every four years (known as ‘whole-council elections’).
The report considered last night set out pros and cons of each option.
The benefits of moving to all out elections set out included:
- We are an outlier – out of 52 unitary authorities, Wokingham Borough is only one of 16 councils in England that still has election-by-thirds in some form. In November last year, the Local Government Association, which represents councils across the country, recommended that we consider moving to whole-council elections.
- The cost and the disruption to the Council caused by having elections in three out of every four years is massive. Time is taken up preparing for elections, decisions can’t be taken during the election period, and tasks are put on hold as staff undertake election activities. Indeed, our senior officers estimate that whole-council elections would save more than £4.3million of Council Taxpayers’ money over four years. That’s the same as the total annual Council Tax from almost 2,200 Band D equivalent households.
- Finally, election-by-thirds means all wards would have three councillors. The only way we could do this is to lump areas together that don’t have anything in common. Parts of Hurst could have to be combined together with Wokingham, and parts would be combined with Twyford. Sonning would have to join Woodley. Finchampstead and Wokingham Without could need to be split and put together with other neighbouring areas.
Some of the potential benefits of the elections by thirds are also set out in the report that Executive considered last night.
This is a brief outline of the arguments, and more information would be included in the public consultation. We would advertise the consultation, and I’d encourage you to share your views so that we get the right system of elections for Wokingham Borough.